| Introduction:
Dear friends in Christ, we meet in his name, as the pilgrim people of
God, to do the work of his Church and I thank you for your attendance at
this Diocesan Synod of Cork, Cloyne and Ross – my third as your
Bishop.
Kinsale 400
For our Diocesan Synod this year we come to popular, fashionable and
picturesque Kinsale. To us in the Diocese it is an important parish,
most of all for the vibrancy of its ministry and witness today, but also
for the historic and heritage significance of Saint Multose Church in
which we worshipped earlier. At the General Synod one of the visitors
from another Church took me aside to say that I should know as Bishop of
Cork, about the wonderful welcome he had received not only here in
Kinsale during a visit last year, but also in churches throughout the
diocese. I was glad to hear this and continue to encourage you all to
have a spirit of welcome hospitality to visitors and strangers who come
among us.
We also come to Kinsale in this 400th Anniversary year of the longest
march in Irish history, (an event to be re-enacted starting on 21st
July), and scene of that pivotal battle of 1601, a turning point in
Irish history, the outcome of which shaped Ireland for so many years
since.
The Battle of Kinsale was more than the clash of two opposing
military forces. It was a harrowing meeting of opposing cultures.
A Multi-Cultural/Multi-Ethnic/Multi-Faith Ireland
If Ireland ever was a monochrome clash between two cultures pitted
against one another (and that would be a naïve analysis), it most
certainly isn’t today. Ours is not a socially, culturally or
religiously homogenous society. Rather, we live in an increasingly
multi-cultural society, as evidenced by a veritable gamut of
sub-cultures, a pluriformity of nationalities, lifestyles and
expressions of humanity. This plurality, uneasy as some may feel about
it, is asserted in the world of belief and religious profession too.
How do we react to such a context?
In his much-acclaimed book, one that has made an impression on me, The
Collage of God, Mark Oakley, former Chaplain to the Bishop of
London, says this:
“…I see the need for a renewed spirit of liberality in the
Church, a spirit concerned to ensure that the Church keeps a breadth
of mind, a general courtesy in its communal life, a desire to defend
another’s right of speech and interpretation of shared texts, and
maintains a greater concern to check it own prejudices than preserved
its so-called ‘purity’. A person only need spend a short time
reflecting on how he or she has changed views throughout his or her
life so far, and think about how they may change again in the future,
to realise that the Church should be able to hold all this within –
and much more as well. … Such liberality… will celebrate diversity
and be unashamed of a necessary pluriformity regarding differing views
on certain controversial topics.” [i]
Year after year we articulate the reality that we are living in the
midst of immense change. “This can be very disturbing and can
encourage us to be defensive and backward-looking because we are afraid.
Or we can recognise that making sense of our life and seeking to
humanise the emerging shape of our culture is the risky but essential
journey for all who believe and trust in God” [ii]
As Christians we can surely come to understand what it means
confidently to have faith living as we do in a pluralist society and
also to be inclusive in our belonging and believing.
Disappointment with Recent Church Controversies
It is for this reason, among others, that I feel a measure of despair
when I see we Christians in Ireland investing such energy into such
things as invitations to State receptions; who is worthy to receive Holy
Communion and who isn’t (when few of us actually are!); and the
seemingly inexhaustible residual bigotry that plagues us, when in actual
fact, that same energy might more usefully be channelled, in the name of
Christ, into overcoming our ecclesial divisions, into acts of Christian
service and compassionate Christ-like outreach to the so many vulnerable
people and those wounded by life in our own pews and in society at
large.
In the course of one of those very debates I spoke to a single mother
in the hotel where I was staying during General Synod. “Tell them to
grow up!” she said. “There are many of us here in this situation.
Tell those bishops to stop getting at me and the likes of me. I need
their prayers instead.” I felt challenged by and empathised with that.
We have got to learn to face up to and engage maturely with the new
Ireland. The call of Mary Robinson, the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights, (although she was referring to political leaders,
speaking in Strasbourg), last October, might as easily be directed at us
in the churches:
We need to hear our … leaders championing diversity, extolling
the virtues of multicultural, multi-ethnic societies, defending the
vulnerable."
Referendum Turnout a Scandal
In this society of ours, and indeed in these islands, the past days
have been dominated by voting and the previous weeks by referenda here,
and elections in Great Britain and the north of Ireland.
One of the scandals – whatever excuses we put on it such as lack of
motivation, disinterest, unattractiveness or irrelevance of the
proposition, or the sense of its making no difference – is the poor
level of turnout for referenda and elections - with the exception of
Northern Ireland. Here it appears to have been about 35% - the second
lowest referendum turnout in the State’s history.
We should never forget that voting is a civic duty and a Christian
responsibility. Democrats should always be exercised by the question of
turnout. I look at my parents who would never think of not voting, and
at my own father in law, who after months in hospital this winter at the
age of 86 hauled himself out on crutches to the polling station
yesterday to vote assisted by my seven year old son. I worry that what
we don’t use we lose: not juridically perhaps, but certainly morally,
and in terms of our involvement and influence.
The Nice Treaty Vote – An Act of Profound Selfishness
I personally greet the news of the rejection of the Nice Treaty with
utter dismay: not for political reasons, but from the perspective of
Christian justice and ecumenism. I have no doubt that our political
neighbours and ecumenical partners in Europe will interpret it as an act
of profound selfishness on our part. For many years the churches in
Europe – our ecumenical co-workers – have sought the justice of an
enlarged European household.
I remember that some years ago when I myself was a member of the
Central Committee of the Conference of European Churches a Romanian
Bishop – Bishop Teofan – said to me that we in Western Europe had
replaced the “Iron Curtain” with a “silver curtain” – a
barrier of money, and economic privilege around a fortress Europe of a
few countries. “Our countries used to prevent us from travelling, now
we cannot because of you.”
Yes, of course, the enlargement of the European Union will have its
price, but I personally cannot accept the naïve view that now we have
milked Europe of all we can, we want selfishly to guard what we have
garnered at the cost of excluding others in the same boat in which we
once found ourselves. And we surely weren’t so shameful as only to be
pro-European as long as the money was coming in?
As I said in the Diocesan Magazine this month I can’t help but
feeling that many have of us has come to think of the European movement
towards integration and co-operation solely in economic terms. Economic
gain and advantage is an undeniably powerful motivation. It is
understandable that from time to time our Euro-community life can cause
us to narrow our focus on particular issues which are having
far-reaching and disturbing consequences in human and national terms.
Our awareness of and practical preparation for the advent of the Euro
compounds this.
I wonder are we in danger of losing sight of the fact that the
European ideal, although it was outwardly economic at first, was and is,
in essence, a peace movement - a movement to reconcile, to create
friendship, to engender goodwill, to break down barriers of culture,
language and detrimental self-interest and to build a peace - a peace
that would last. There can be no doubt that this was what, in the main,
energised and inspired the parents of the European Movement - Jean
Monnet, Konrad Adenauer, Robert Schumann, and others (some of them at
least driven by their Christian faith).
Call to Revisit the aftermath of the McKenna Judgment
Could it not be that the low referendum turnout here was as a result
of pure confusion? and far from providing an equilibrium in the flow of
arguments, the present approach to a referendum here arising from the
McKenna judgment is not the fairness that was clamoured for, but rather
the confusion of information, some of it contrived for the sake of
political rectitude.
The root of the word “lead” comes from the concept of path, road
track or the course of a ship at sea. If we agree that a leader’s role
is to in front of people and thereby show them the way forward and to
take people with them, then whatever side we have taken in these recent
debates, it seems to me that the hands of the people we have
democratically chose to lead us are unduly tied by the McKenna judgment
of 1995.
I worry that in the pursuit of the appearance of the required balance
in the debate, arguments may have been contrived in order to squeeze the
pre-referendum process into rigorous adherence to the overly restrictive
approach arising from that McKenna judgment.
40th Anniversary of the Building of the Berlin Wall:
In this 40th anniversary year of the (13th August) of the building,
in 1961, of the Berlin Wall the enlargement of the European Union would
have been a wonderful symbol of the on-doing of that evil of division.
Perhaps no structure in modern times has been more symbolic of the pain
of institutionalised human division.
Our vocation, in the name of the God who “…has given to us the
ministry of reconciliation…” (2 Corinthians 5.18), while reaching
out to the mystery of truth, is to become a people who destroy walls and
barriers: those put up in peoples’ minds and hearts to shut out others
who look different, those with different abilities and perceptions, ways
of believing, encountering life and expressing their humanity.
Refugees and Asylum Seekers
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the United Nations High
Commission for Refugees. Many will have seen the topical television
advertisement identifying as former refugees some of the world’s
best-known people in many areas. Jesus Christ himself and his family
were refugees. By last year it was reckoned that there are 22.3 million
refugees in the world – that is 1 out of every 269 people on earth:
clearly a dilemma for humanity of enormous proportions.
It is one of the features of modern Europe too that we still witness
scenes of displacement and enforced mobility of people. The
cross-fertilisation of cultures and races is more to the fore than ever.
In 2000 just fewer than 400,000 asylum seekers lodged applications in 15
European Union states.
We are concerned too and it is our responsibility to find ways to
help. In 1992 Ireland only had 39 applications from asylum seekers. By
1998 this had risen to 4630. By the end of 2000 the refugee and asylum
seeker population in Ireland had more than doubled to 10,938.
NASC – Irish Immigrant Support Centre
I know that many in the diocese, led by clergy in the parishes, have
been reaching out the hand of welcome to newcomers to our island home
– to refugees and asylum seekers. For example, 18 months ago I asked
the Dean of Cork and Mrs Marie Norton to represent me at a meeting near
the Cathedral to set up an Immigrant Support Group. Last Monday night, a
sign of practical outreach and Christian responsibility, the Cathedral
parish hosted the first birthday of NASC – the Irish Immigrant Support
Centre. Taking its name from NASC, the Irish word for “link”, the
Centre represents a link between Cork’s immigrant community and Cork’s
voluntary and statutory services and aims to work in a developmental way
alongside, rather than for immigrants.
As a guest, I met many fascinating people - from Nigeria, Ukraine,
the Congo, Belarus, Moscow, Estonia, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, Uganda (and
these were only some of those I met). Present too with many Cathedral
parishioners were some of seventy volunteers who voluntarily assist with
the integration of newcomers into Irish society, whether by language
courses, legal advice and so on.
“I’m going crazy with the idleness” one young man said to me.
This was a sentiment echoed by nearly all the others. One wonders why
this still has to be so? The challenging question on a Refugee Council
website is “Who in the world would you turn to?” I hope that many
who have come to our shores will feel able to turn to us in our local
situations.
In this visit, as in all my public engagements, I gained valuable
insights. I learnt, for example, that the Church is at its most potent
locally; that our partnership with other agencies and with voluntary
groups in society is immensely prized and respected and that Christians
who work out their believing in Christ like service can and do make a
difference to the totality of good at work in our community.
Our Responsibility to Do More to Share the European Dilemma of
Asylum Seekers
Indeed, the question has, I believe, to be put to us in Ireland as to
whether we have as yet begun to do our bit to share adequately in this
European wide concern. In this past week we have heard complaints from
one town in Ireland that it is being asked to do more than its share.
Whether that is so or not I don’t know! But the reality is that
together in Ireland, collectively we must pull together to do our share
of hospitality – commensurate with our resources and our place within
the European household. And that means actively doing more than we have
been doing up until now.
To many this is not a welcome or comfortable viewpoint, but I do
believe it profoundly. It is not simply a political or social
standpoint: it is a Gospel imperative. The Gospel has everything to do
with the struggle for a more human and more stable world.
Racism
A corollary of this development in the life of Ireland has to be a
consequential battle against racism and xenophobia. Through the media
and local knowledge, we have been made fully aware of the dramatic
increase in the number of racist incidents here in Ireland. A recent
survey carried out by the African Refugee Network in Dublin found that a
third of refugees had experienced verbal or physical abuse. As
Christians we not only condemn these unreservedly, but we share
enormously, the responsibility in working for racial justice.
Uncomfortable as it may make us, we have got to realise that the
refugees and asylum seekers who come to our country do not bring racism
with them. It is latent in many of us here. Unless we as Christians
speak out against racial intolerance we will share in the responsibility
It is not enough to be against racism, we have got to do something
about it. For our part, the Diocesan Social Services Committee has been
preparing an awareness leaflet for distribution throughout the Diocese.
I’m aware too that a partnership of Cork-based statutory, voluntary,
community, academic, trade union and business groups have developed a
proposal for a City-wide anti-racism initiative with the theme Cork
– One City, Many Communities.
In a speech in February 2001, Overseas Development and Human Rights
Minister, Liz O'Donnell, T. D., urged young people in Ireland to:
"deploy their vigour and idealism to counter racism and
intolerance, and become, in effect, human rights defenders here in
Ireland". However, this must not be a crusade of the young alone.
It’s a cause all need to espouse.
Death Penalty and the International Criminal Court
While the Death Penalty was abolished in Ireland in 1990 the residual
possibility of its restitution remained. On Thursday, we voted for the
removal from the Constitution of references to the death penalty and the
introduction of a Constitutional ban against the death penalty. This is
a further significant move, but again I was astonished by the percentage
of “no” votes on this matter.
As a student, and ever since, I have been passionate in my belief
that the death penalty is always wrong. That this is now to be enshrined
in our approach to justice is hugely welcome. Naïve as it may seem, I
have always been persuaded by the simple logic of the argument which
suggests that “Killing someone in order to show killing is wrong” is
perverse. Without trivialising in any way the horror and inhuman
consequences of some peoples’ crimes, and the on-going plight of so
many victims, I personally deplore the continued use, in some countries
of the death penalty. The answer to inhumanity must never be inhumanity
nor to repay a low perception of the value on human life with like. As I
detest the crimes so too I detest the mechanism of execution such as
that vaunted on our television newscasts this very weekend.
In terms of searching for new ways of dealing with horrific crimes, a
major development is the International Criminal Court, for which we also
voted. In International Law and the protection of human rights it will
provide a mechanism to try, in certain defined circumstances, persons
charged with genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and
aggression worldwide.
The Peace Process in Ireland
Living as closely together as these two islands – Great Britain and
Ireland – we cannot but glance sideways at elections there. Of immense
import to us, even living at the other end of the island, as we do, is
the outcome of the elections in the North of Ireland. We deplore the
heinous juxtaposition of the terrorist past of northern Ireland with its
peaceful future as manifested in the dastardly shootings at Draperstown.
As we look on we have been alerted to see this, not only as a battle
between and within nationalism and unionism, but also as a pronouncement
on the Belfast Agreement. Hasty comment would serve no one well.
However, indications are that there has been a clear gravitational move
in voting to two extremes of the political spectrum. The apparent
substantial shift of support from the courageous pro-agreement middle
ground as represented by David Trimble who has taken such political
risks, is worrying, to say the least.
What the implications are now for the Good Friday Agreement we can
only wait to see. Early expert assessment that the Agreement is “under
fierce renewed pressure” is very troubling indeed, as the agreement
represents the only viable and meaningful way forward for political
progress on our island. While determined work is still required on the
seemingly intractable aspects of the situation– demilitarisation,
decommissioning and policing - walking away from the Agreement cannot be
a tolerable option. What is needed now will surely be a determined fight
for the Agreement itself.
Euro
As we look forward to the arrival of Euro cash in our wallets, purses
and pockets in 2002 I again underline the concern being expressed by
many charities and voluntary groups. We do need the message to be
carried far and wide in the parishes that a simple pound for euro
equivalence in giving will greatly undermine our work and budget. I hope
that people, having had so much forewarning of this change, will be able
to reflect practically on their giving and to ensure that the Church’s
work is not adversely affected. What we need is a process of reflection
akin to a diocesan wide stewardship programme in order to prepare for
the Euro.
Foot and Mouth Crisis
A matter of days after our annual Clergy Conference on the topic of
Being Church in a Rural Diocese these islands and others in Europe were
plunged into the stark menace of the present Foot and Mouth Crisis.
There was an apt but perverse coincidence in the juxtaposition of the
conference theme and the onset of this further threat to the rural
context and agricultural framework of much of our economy.
I think the farming community and its dependent hinterland realise
that they have had our unqualified solidarity. It has been more than a
collective or selfish sense of economic and social vulnerability. There
has been, I believe, throughout this crisis, a genuine embrace of urban
and rural and a renewed symbiotic sense of interdependence: for that we
should be grateful.
Looking Back
Last year we had a special and invigorating programme to mark the
Year celebrated universally as the start of a new Millennium. Since the
last Diocesan Synod highlights included a Presidential visit to Saint
Luke’s Home, the inauguration of the Bishop’s Course in Theology,
and our Parish Days in November
Church Matters in the Diocese
Having begun each of my Diocesan Synod addressed so far by looking at
issues of wider concern in 1999, my first year, I went on to reflect on
the nature of the Church and to signal the sort of Church I should like
us to become. Last year, coinciding with our visit to West Cork, I
focussed on our character as predominantly a rural Church. This year I
wish to look more introspectively at some specific aspects of our being
a Diocese.
Episcopal Visitation 2001
The Episcopal Visitation I undertook earlier this year prompts me to
this, in part. Following on the review last year by Rural Deans and
their advisers of the format of Rural Deans’ Annual Inspections, I
decided to initiate a five year process of formal Visitation or survey
of the Diocese. This was prepared in December and completed by
incumbents and Priests in Charge in the third week of January last.
I am most adamant that this is not simply an exercise in numbers,
evaluation, invigilation or supervision. It is about people, ministry
and faithfulness to the Gospel in our time. It is part of a process of
on-going discernment, introspection and reflection so that we may, with
the help of God the Holy Spirit, respond more faithfully to the calling
to be disciples of Christ today. To that end, in my oversight as your
Bishop, I need, from time to time, to be given an overview. This is a
small part of that snapshot.
A have drawn up what is only a numerical summary of the results of
that survey. As I covenanted at the time no place or person is
identifiable and any comment I make is general in character.
The visitation does challenge and encourage us.
I am encouraged, for example, by the amount of contact we have, even
if only occasionally with so many people – such as 6642 adults at
Christmas last year. This is something to be grateful for and to build
on.
I am challenged by the total number of individuals cited in the
returns as 7669. This is over 2000 people less than cited themselves as
Church of Ireland at the last census in the State. I wonder why this is
so. Have we lost contact with those people? Or is that our system of
assessment in the Diocese, whereby a levy is placed on total non-church
going population, mitigates against inclusiveness and outreach? Have we
become exclusive (and I hope not) in who we exclude from membership? Do
we not need to allow people the integrity of their own self-definition
and include them on that basis alone?
POWG
The outcome of this Visitation will give us all some very basic
information about ourselves as we seek a strategic way forward in our
common calling to be faithful in this place to God’s will. The Parish
Organisation Working Group, established last year as an advisory group
to me as Bishop to look at strategic questions and to envision ways
forward, will find the insights helpful too.
For example, looking at the number of people in the Diocese - 7669
– 25% of whom are under 18 years of age – one has to ask questions
such as: For how long can we sustain our present pattern of ministry,
the current number of Church services and maintain the existing
infrastructure? More important, how do we shape and adapt our existing
scheme to minister to other people, specifically those who do not
belong? What alterations in our form of ministry do we need to make to
channel resources into ministry and social concern in other sectors?
Then too there is our responsibility to institutions such as our
schools, third level colleges, commercial life, voluntary groups and
chaplaincies.
It is clear to me that some adaptation in deployment will be needed,
and even from a small diocese such as ours, we will have to discover
ways of implementing patterns of ministry which go beyond the
traditional one of parish priest in local parish.
Reluctant as some may be, we all know that more change is inevitable.
Society is changing. In spite of the good times there is a limited pool
of money for maintenance of buildings and meeting increasing
assessments. There is the on-going strategy of improving the
remuneration and conditions for clergy. There are fewer clergy and more
multi-parish benefices. More change is inevitable and we will need to be
open, flexible and adaptable.
Youth Work Review
Looking at the Visitation we see that nearly 37% of our Diocesan
Population is under 30 years of age and 25% under 18. This begs the
question about our approach to and investment of time and resources in
this sector.
In the past year our Youth Work Review Group has made encouraging
progress in its review and work, most notably with the Y Bother
event in Saint Fin Barre’s Cathedral in February. Later this year they
will come to us as a Diocese with an analysis, to suggest a way forward
and to ask us, how serious we are about engaging in youth ministry in
this way.
Survey shows disappointment at Ecumenical Commitment
Even though the ecumenical scenario has vastly changed in Ireland in
recent times, it was disappointing to read in my Episcopal Visitation
survey of 2001 that there is a sense of despondency among about half the
clergy and parishes in the diocese about the progress in and quality of
fundamental ecumenical relationships. 46.4%, or almost half, of parishes
indicated that such contacts were only average or even bad.
This gives me a sense of priority to renew our energy in this area of
our vocation. Our pursuit towards discovering and making manifest that
unity which is already Christ’s gift to the Church is not an optional
extra, but it is inescapably intrinsic to the Gospel we profess. I,
personally, should like to see an increase in bilateral contacts, a long
the lines, for example, albeit only in some parts of the Diocese, of
groups which met to discuss with local Methodists, the proposed draft
covenant between our two churches.
Equipping the Laity
The launch of the Bishop’s Course in Theology was a beginning and a
powerful symbol of intent that we should once again put theology within
the grasp of lay people. In many ways it is a rescue of theology from
the academy and putting it back where it belongs – in the Christian
community.
One of the questions in the Episcopal Visitation related to the
Ministry of the Laity. Ministry is not the prerogative of Bishops,
Priests and Deacons: all the baptised are called to ministry.
In spite of its being said again and again, we clearly have not yet
mobilised the potential and creativity of lay people in our Church.
Looking at the Episcopal Visitation I was concerned and how little
training is available to lay people who are asked to fulfil a variety of
ministries.
To this end, I wish to signal my intent to examine, with you, the
possibility of inaugurating a course parallel to the Bishop’s Course
in Theology, which would equip lay people locally for pastoral ministry.
Other similar course already exist in the Church of Ireland, and I have
reason to believe that funding would be attainable.
Your Faithfulness
Highlighting the importance of lay ministry, gives me the opportunity
once again to underscore the fact that ministry would be impossible
without the partnership of all of you, and volunteers like you, in the
parishes: on Select Vestries, in Sunday Clubs, music ministry, school
Boards, fund-raising, visiting, maintenance, ………the list is
endless. And this is the way it should be, for in our baptism we are all
recruited as ministers of God.
Saint Luke’s Home, Lapp’s Court, Kingston College
There are many expressions of such ministry in our diocese. Saint
Luke’s Home, Lapp’s Court and Kingston College are three facets of
our work in this area which give tangible expression to the social
outreach and ministry of the Church which can truly be described as diakonia.
Indeed in some of our fellow Lutheran churches they would formally be
part of the diaconal ministerial departments of the Church. Kingston
College is witnessing a major restoration programme at this very time.
We are excited too at the prospect of our partnership with the Southern
Health Board which will enable a fourth unit of an additional thirty
beds at Saint Luke’s Home within the next few years. All of this, and
other work like it throughout the diocese, is an expression of our
Gospel commitment in action.
Primary School RE
Late last month infant teachers in our primary schools attended a
training seminar for the new Primary School Religious Education
Curriculum – Here we Go! and On our Way! I welcome the
progressive publication of this curriculum; the ecumenical partnership
it represents and I congratulate those who have worked on it.
At long last schools are beginning to have available to them the RE
curriculum for which they have been crying out with the resources they
have specifically asked for. It is magnificently produced with a text
book and workbook for each child and a handbook for teachers. In this
way RE will also, like other subjects, be carried back and forward from
schools to homes in school bags.
As Patron of 18 schools, and in accordance with the expectation of
the national primary school curriculum, I wish to underline that this
curriculum, as it comes on stream for each age group, should be
implemented in all our schools as the mainstay of our Religious
Education programme, that Boards of Management should make the necessary
resources available and wherever possible parishes, through Select
Vestries should partner this implementation.
General Synod 2001
Returning to reflection on General Synod 2001 for a moment as
Chairman of the Synodical Structures Working Group, disappointed but not
surprised by the Synod’s rejection of our proposals. I believe that
although ours was a radical proposal it was even-handed and
proportionate in its dealing with each Diocese in the Church of Ireland.
I am concerned, therefore, that in the wake of our failure, there should
not be some ill-conceived unjust scheme whereby the balance of
representation would simply shift to reflect numerical strength in the
bigger dioceses. Likewise, I was concerned that the General Synod failed
to recognise the need identified by the Bishops, to regulate the
existing chaotic situation in relation to Holy Communion for the
baptised but unconfirmed. Synod was not, in my view, primarily being
asked to legislate for a complete abandonment of current practice, but
rather to regulate the present diversity which arises in the normal
course of things. As a result it may well be that bishops locally will
have to provide their own pastoral guidelines for such situations.
Communication
This year we added a new member to our Diocesan Team. Sybil Fuller
was appointed part-time Diocesan Communications’ Officer last August
and since then has had a remarkable effect on our work in this area.
With her now characteristic turn of phrase and fresh eye on so many
things, we come across her work in many publications and media. Sybil we
are so glad to have you on board. Thank you for all you do and we hope
that you enjoy this new exploration too.
Chancellors
Last Easter Judge J Gerard Buchanan, coincidentally a parishioner of
my former parish of Castleknock, who had been Chancellor of the Diocese
appointed by Bishop Gordon Perdue decided to retire. In his place I have
appointed Mr Lyndon MacCann BL (coincidentally a former parishioner of
Castleknock – continuing the tradition!) as Chancellor. In both these
people, the former and the new, we have been fortunate to have people
for whom I also have the highest regard. In them we have trusted
friends, people whose professional expertise we can rely on and who are
understanding fellow-pilgrims in the faith. I thank them, Judge Buchanan
for all he has done and been, and Lyndon MacCann for accepting this
appointment.
Diocesan Registrar
As I reflect on the legal side of our Diocesan family, I take this
opportunity to pay tribute to our former Diocesan Registrar – John
Bennett Jermyn, who died on 22nd February. He succeeded his father John
Jermyn who had been Diocesan Registrar since 1914 on 23rd October 1947
and served ably and faithfully until November 1980 when he was succeeded
by his son, our Diocesan Registrar today Mr John Jermyn. In offering our
sincere sympathy to John Jermyn and his family, we record our thanks and
indebtedness for all the assistance and backup so readily given by our
Diocesan Registrar, especially to me as Bishop.
The Very Reverend Maurice Carey
The death took place on 20th April last of the Very Reverend Maurice
Carey, who was Dean of Cork from 1971 until 1993. For my part I knew him
from my days as a member of the choir, as an encourager to me in
ministry, as a colleague on the Liturgical Advisory Committee and more
recently as my partner in Broadcasting Training Seminars for those about
to do Sunday Services on RTE radio. We remember him with affection today
and give thanks to God for his faithful ministry not only in this
Diocese but throughout the Church.
Deployments
Since last Diocesan Synod the Reverend David Armstrong was instituted
to the incumbency of Carrigaline Union, and the Reverend Eithne Lynch to
Kilmoe Union. Canon Hilary Wakeman retired from the fulltime stipendiary
ministry and the Reverend Lionel Mackey resigned from the Incumbency of
Templebreedy Group. During the year Richard Dring, Walter Hill, David
Syms, John Tanner and Pamela Wood were licensed as Diocesan Readers.
The new scheme for Sabbatical leave for clergy has now been tried and
tested - appropriately in the first instance by the Archdeacon. I take
this opportunity to thank him for his indefatigable energy, faithfulness
and willingness as Archdeacon – a most demanding and responsible role
in any diocese. We are truly blessed with our Archdeacon! Canon Michael
Burrows, rector of Bandon Union is the next candidate for Sabbatical
leave and we wish him a fruitful and recreating time this year. [We will
miss your three months’ notes in the Diocesan Magazine!] At this point
too we have three ordinands in training for ordained ministry at the
Church of Ireland Theological College.
In-Service training
I am grateful to parishes who have supported so generously the Bishop’s
Ministry Fund. Through your assistance I am beginning to be able to
create a fund which has a meaningful potential for in-service training
of clergy in particular. As I meet friends in other walks of life I
detect the seriousness of the approach in other sectors to the on-going
training of workers and employees.
We have not yet, I fear, (and we need urgently to do so) created a
model of practice in the Church which provides adequately for the
on-going training and retraining of our clergy and Church workers.
Ministry has such a multi-faceted scope that no one person can
adequately embrace, yet alone keep up to date, with all the skills and
insights necessary to fulfil the work in hand.
Ms Maud Levis
At the end of September Maud Levis will retire from her position of
responsibility in Beara Union which she has fulfilled so conscientiously
and faithfully. This is Maud’s last Diocesan Synod in this position. I
know of the admiration we all hold for her as someone who embarked on
such an innovative approach in that area of the diocese. And I know too
that on all your behalf, I extend to her our love, sincerest thanks and
warmest good wishes for her retirement.
Retired Clergy
This year I want to make a special tribute to a group of people on
whom we rely so utterly week by week. I feel guilty that this is so.
Without them, as things stand, we would not be able to keep the show on
the road. I speak of the retired clergy….
Diocesan Office
I reserve my last word of thanks and the prime position of resounding
punctuation on this address for our wonderful friends in the Diocesan
Office. To Wilfred Baker as Diocesan Secretary, and to Ruby Veitch as
assistant I say “I don’t know where we would be without you!” We
are thankful that Ruby has once again recovered from a bout in hospital.
Wilfred is juggles a huge portfolio of roles on our behalf and he does
so with immense conscientious, effectiveness and thoroughness. How
fortunate indeed we are! Thank you for all you are and do.
Conclusion
Friends in Christ, we share a vocation together as disciples of Jesus
Christ in the 21st Century.
The great composer Rachmaninov once said:
I am myself only in music.
Music is enough for a whole lifetime –
But a lifetime is not enough for music.
In that sense of calling, privilege and dedication we can see our own
role and raison d’être as Christians today.
We are in this Diocesan Synod today in faithfulness to that
irrepressible allegiance and we entrust our proceedings to the mystery,
leadership and guidance of God the Holy Trinity.
[i] Oakley, Mark The Collage of God DLT London 2001
[ii] Gladwin, John Love and Liberty DLT London 1998 |